http://www.studynotes24.co.za/download/motan-and-another-v-joosub-1930/ WebIn Motan and Another v Joosub 1930 AD 61, it was held that in terms of our common law the paternal grandfather of an extra-marital child owes no duty of support to the child. The issue in this application is whether the common law rule as enunciated in Motan, passes constitutional muster.

A grandchild

WebFeb 27, 2013 · What was the legal question in Morton and another v joosub 1930 ad 61? Wiki User. ∙ 2013-02-27 07:30:34. Add an answer. Want this question answered? Be notified when an answer is posted. Webparent and grandchild (Motan v Joosub 1930 AD 61 70), as well as between sib-lings in the second degree (brothers and sisters) (Vaughan v SA National Trust and Assurance Co … stakeholders involved in a project

Motan and Another v Joosub 1930 - Study Notes24

WebREPORTABLEIN THE high COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA [ cape OF good hope provincial division]Case No: 6541/03 In the matter between:JADE LEE PETERSEN ApplicantandTHE MAINTENANCE OFFICERSIMON S TOWN MAINTENANCE COURT First RespondentGASANT ABRAHAMSS econd RespondentSAADIA ABRAHAMS Third … WebHeld The case of Motan and another v Joosub 1930 AD 61 was authority for the proposition that the paternal grandparents of an extramarital child do not owe a duty of … WebThe paternal grandfather of an illegitimate child is under no obligation to support such child. The decision of the Transvaal Provincial Division in _Motan and Another v Joosub, _ … perry\u0027s woodlands texas