Drennan v. star paving company
WebDrennan v. Star Paving Co. Court of Appeals of California. Apr 3, 1958. 323 P.2d 477 (Cal. Ct. App. 1958) Case details for. Drennan v. Star Paving Co. Case Details. Full title: … WebP arties: Drennan, plaintiff-appellan t; Star P aving Co., de f endant-appellee. Drennan, a c ontr actor , sued Star P aving Co., a sub -contr actor , for refusing t o perfor m paving …
Drennan v. star paving company
Did you know?
WebAbout 20,546 Results. Drennan v. Star Paving Co. 51 cal. 2d 409, 333 p.2d 757 (1958) Plaintiff was a licensed general contractor preparing a bid for a school district. Defendant subcontractor was the lowest bidder for the paving work. Plaintiff used defendant's bid in computing his own bid for a school project. WebDrennan v. Star Paving Co51 Cal.2d 409, 333 P.2d 757 (1958) SKB Industries, Inc. v. Insite250 Ga. App. 574, 551 S.E.2d 380 (Ct. App. 2001) Avoidance Of Contracts Breach Of Contract And Permissible Remedial Responses Contract Dispute Resolution: Some Alternatives To Courts
WebContracts 9/12/08 Mutual Assent Drennan v. Star Paving Co., California Supreme Court, 1958 Facts: Plaintiff’s (contractor) secretary received a telephone call from defendant’s … WebStar Paving Co. Drennan v. Star Paving Co. 51 Cal.2d 409, 333 P.2d 757 (Cal. 1958) Drennan, a licensed general contractor, was preparing a bid on the "Monte Vista School" in California. It was customary in that area for general contractors to receive the bids of subcontractors by telephone on the day of bidding and to rely upon these bids in ...
Web(This rule gets replaced later by Traynor’s rule (in Drennan).) Drennan v. Star Paving where paving subcontractor submitted bid for paving work to general contractor, and bid was silent with respect to right of paving subcontractor to revoke the bid, and general contractor used the bid in making its own successful bid on the main contract ... WebThe following day, defendant’s engineer claimed there was a mistake in the bid and that they could not do the paving work for less than $15,000. Sometime later, plaintiff got another …
WebDrennan v. Star Paving Co.. Facts: Defendant appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action to recover damages caused by the company's failure to perform paving work according to a bid it submitted to the plaintiff. Defendant asserts that there was no enforceable contract between the parties because the offer made was revocable and …
Web**Drennan v. Star Paving Co.(1958);pg. 326, briefed 10/16/ Prepared by Roger Martin (people.qualcomm/rmartin/) Facts:π is a general contractor who was bidding for a contract to construct a school. ∆ phoned in a bid of $7,000 to π to do the paving. π used this bid in his calculations, and was awarded the lana del rey without makeup 9gagWebCitation22 Ill.382 S.W.2d 198 (Ky. 1964) Brief Fact Summary. Plaintiff lessee, entered into a 10 year lease agreement with the Defendant lessor. The lease agreement included an option to renew the lease for an additional ten years, but did not set the rent amount for the additional ten years. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Under helping a packrat parent hold an estate saleWebDrennan v. Star Paving Co.. Facts: Contractor received a bid from a sub-contractor to complete a construction job. Contractor used the sub-contractor's bid in formulating his own bid for the project. Contractor was awarded the project. After being awarded the project, the sub-contractor came to contractor and let the contractor know that it could no longer … lana del rey will you still love meWebIn Drennan v. Star Paving Co. (1958), 51 Cal.2d 409, 415, 333 P.2d 757, 760, the California Supreme Court, relying on Section 90, held that a subcontractor's bid was … lana del rey with fansWebStar Paving Co. (Star) (defendant) contacted Drennan and submitted a bid of $7,131 for the paving work. This was the lowest bid, and Drennan relied on Star’s bid when computing his own bid for the project. Drennan’s bid was lowest and he was ultimately awarded the general contract. Drennan promptly informed Star it was awarded the subcontract. helping anxious students move forwardWebDee. 1958] DRENNAN tI. STAR PAVING CO. (51 C.2d 409: 333 P.2d '7571 r~llson for enforcing it, since it misled the general eontrartor as to the cost of doing the paving. [8] Id.-Promissory Estoppel.-As between a subcontractor who made a bid for paving work and the general contractor who ... lana del rey who dated whoWebWILLIAM A. DRENNAN, Respondent, v. STAR PAVING COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant. Atus P. Reuther, Norman Soibelman, Obegi & High and Earl J. McDowell for … helping anxiety in children